If its just serving static files nginx should perform better without caching, unless they are calling PHP for all images (in which case thats the root of their performance problem)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, yung <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:innobak@gmail.com">innobak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">should be able to use a cache with either nginx+caching or Squid Cache.<br>
<br>
<br>
2010/10/14 Indo Php <<a href="mailto:iptablez@yahoo.com">iptablez@yahoo.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> hi there,<br>
> we have an image hosting, and of course we're using Nginx!<br>
> Now on we're having problem with disk i/o. With 200GB of images.<br>
> Is there any recommendation for this matter? Nginx configuration or<br>
> Hardware/other software configuration?<br>
> We already used Dual Quad Core 3Ghz, 8 GB RAM, 6x73GB 15k SCSI server<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> nginx mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:nginx@nginx.org">nginx@nginx.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx" target="_blank">http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
nginx mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:nginx@nginx.org">nginx@nginx.org</a><br>
<a href="http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx" target="_blank">http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://thewarezscene.org">Warez Scene</a> <a href="http://www.nexusddl.com">Free Rapidshare Downloads</a><br><br>