what is the advantage of this over the amazon cdn, <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/">http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/</a> ?<div><br></div><div>now this is really offtopic, we can move to private with this thread<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, zepolen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zepolen@gmail.com">zepolen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Why? You use the proxy_store mechanism as a cache - it would only keep<br>
the most used videos.<br>
<br>
In return you save on paying s3 outgoing bandwidth (and your own<br>
provider for incoming bandwith). Instead you only pay for your<br>
outgoing bandwidth on your local server for the times a cache hits.<br>
<br>
I don't do this for videos, but for images - instead of serving '000s<br>
of tb of data each month from s3, I use my local server which will do<br>
the same traffic for a third of the price.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:26 PM, István <<a href="mailto:leccine@gmail.com">leccine@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> not rellay a cheap solution :)<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, zepolen <<a href="mailto:zepolen@gmail.com">zepolen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> You could use proxy_store to save a local copy to the local drive, and<br>
>> serve from nginx after that.<br>
>><br>
>> However I am not sure if this would work wrt streaming.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Kingsley Foreman<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:kingsley@internode.com.au">kingsley@internode.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > Id also love a module like this.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > something that converts the start= line it a content range for a<br>
>> > proxy_pass<br>
>> > and then returns the data as a normal 200 (from the byte range)<br>
>> ><br>
>> > It would make me a very happy man.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Kingsley<br>
>> > From: Fernando Flórez<br>
>> > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 8:31 AM<br>
>> > To: <a href="mailto:nginx@sysoev.ru">nginx@sysoev.ru</a><br>
>> > Subject: Re: nginx flv module and amazon storage<br>
>> > I'm talking about S3. I know it works with local files but i was hoping<br>
>> > to<br>
>> > be wrong :)<br>
>> > Thanks!<br>
>> ><br>
>> > El 11/10/2009, a las 16:23, István escribió:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Actually flv module works on local files, while -if you are referring to<br>
>> > S3-<br>
>> > it is stored remotely.<br>
>> > Or, if you are talking about having an EC2 instance using EBS storage it<br>
>> > is<br>
>> > possible.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Regards,<br>
>> > Istvan<br>
>> ><br>
>> > 2009/10/11 Fernando Flórez <<a href="mailto:fernando@funciton.com">fernando@funciton.com</a>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Hello,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Quick question before trying it for myself. Is it possible to use<br>
>> >> nginx's<br>
>> >> flv module with flv files stores on amazon's storage cloud?<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> What i'm trying to achieve is to host the flv files on amazon and serve<br>
>> >> the flv files with nginx. Any hints on how to accomplish this?<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Thanks,<br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > --<br>
>> > the sun shines for all<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> the sun shines for all<br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>the sun shines for all<br>
</div>