<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:54 +0300<BR>> From: is@rambler-co.ru<BR>> To: nginx@sysoev.ru<BR>> Subject: Re: I hope the codes can compiled under MingW<BR>> <BR>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:16:47AM +0800, ?????? wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > Cause MingW will compile the codes to native binary,I hope some day I can get this kind of codes.I think it's better than the one compiled under Cygwin.<BR>> <BR>> I have non-public and unready for production Win32 sources,<BR>> they are built by MSVC 6/7/8, Borland C 5.5, and OpenWatcom.<BR>> Now I use this for warning testing only, so I did not create<BR>> a build procedure for MinGW as various gcc versions are available on Unix.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -- <BR>> Igor Sysoev<BR>> http://sysoev.ru/en/<BR>> <BR><BR>
That's sound like good! But I feel that MinGW/gcc may make something different than MSVC/Borland C and others.<BR>
I think supporting and maintaining the codes for MinGW/gcc is more easier than for MSVC/Borland C and others.<BR>
I'd tried to compile nginx under MinGW and found that I had to change so much codes to fit MinGW's lack of included headers. I think it's easy to fixed on you side.<BR>
I think that binaries compiled by MinGW/gcc is pretty similar with MSVC/Borland C and others compiled, because they all are Windows native binaries.<BR>
As you see, now many opensource projects are planned to support compiling under MinGW/gcc but not MSVC/Borland C and others.<BR><br /><hr />更多热辣资讯尽在新版MSN首页！ <a href='http://cn.msn.com/' target='_new'>立刻访问！</a></body>
</html>