Is this a good replacement instead of using Haproxy?<br><br>Asif Ali<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Stephen Nelson-Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sanelson@gmail.com">sanelson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
>> That looks good. If I add <a href="http://backend3.example.com" target="_blank">backend3.example.com</a> backup, I assume that<br>
>> is used only if backed2 fails.<br>
><br>
> No, your assumption is wrong. All servers with backup flag are<br>
> activated if all servers without backup flag are dead.<br>
<br>
</div>Ahh... So is there a way to do this:<br>
<br>
* backend1 (primary)><br>
* if backend1 fails, send traffic to backend2<br>
* if backend2 fails, send traffic to backend3<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
S.<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>