Thanks all. But what about SSL or some services like ftp?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:49 AM, mike <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike503@gmail.com">mike503@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">yes that's what i meant with "plenty of options"<br>
<br>
depending on how important sessions are you can determine if you need<br>
memcached alone, memcached with db-backing (what is that, a<br>
"write-through cache" ?) etc<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Cliff Wells <<a href="mailto:cliff@develix.com">cliff@develix.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:41 -0700, mike wrote:<br>
>> I'll give you the advice I give everyone else: forget session<br>
>> persistence. Use a central session store.<br>
><br>
> Or a distributed session store if scalability is a big concern.<br>
> Memcached is designed to do this very thing.<br>
><br>
> Cliff<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>