<div dir="ltr">On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:58 PM, mike <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike503@gmail.com">mike503@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Witt <<a href="mailto:thomas.witt@infopark.de">thomas.witt@infopark.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Please Igor, expand this to regard at least the proxy_pass_header<br>
> directive.<br>
<br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">> In my opinion this special handling of headers makes no sense - when<br>
> using a normal upstream you can pass any header you want to. Why don't<br>
> to so when using X-Accel-Redirect.<br>
<br>
</div>I agree. I don't see a need to have limitations on this, myself.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>I also agree. I would love this feature.<br>
</div>