<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 15:25, Maxim Dounin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mdounin@mdounin.ru">mdounin@mdounin.ru</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hello!<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:47:13PM +0300, Kirill A. Korinskiy wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:55, Maxim Dounin <<a href="mailto:mdounin@mdounin.ru">mdounin@mdounin.ru</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:10:01AM +0300, Kirill A. Korinskiy wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>[...]<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> > > Update patches attached.<br>
> ><br>
> > This patch is just wrong.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Attach a new version of patch. openssl start use new interface only<br>
> after OpenSSL_1_0_0-beta1. And I change version to it. yes, it's<br>
<br>
</div>Oh.<br>
<br>
I've already provided links to appropriate changesets. Using<br>
0x10000000L as in your original patch is fine, all openssl<br>
versions with OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10000000L had "const".</blockquote><div><br></div><div>ok </div></div><br>-- <br><div>wbr, Kirill</div><br>